ANN ARBOR, Mich. -- Michigan coach Jim Harbaugh said he has not spoken to Big Ten commissioner Jim Delaney since the league publicly reprimanded him last week and he is ready to move on from his comments about the officiating in his teams loss at Ohio State on Nov. 26 to end the regular season.Harbaugh spoke to reporters via teleconference on Sunday night for the first time since saying he was bitterly disappointed in the referees at the game in Columbus. The league fined Michigan $10,000 last week and reprimanded the coach for violating the leagues sportsmanship policy. When asked if those actions would change the way he acts moving forward, Harbaugh said he didnt think it would stop him from speaking his mind.I still dont accept it as a given that you cant speak your mind and give your opinion on how you see things, he said. If telling the truth makes things worse, then so be it.Harbaugh said he watched the film of the game -- a 30-27 double-overtime loss that ended one play after officials granted a first down to Ohio States offense on a controversial fourth-down spot -- and it didnt persuade him to reconsider his comments at all. He also disagreed with several other calls made earlier in the game.I guess we can all just [say] we see it differently and leave it go at that, Harbaugh said.Michigan finished sixth in the College Football Playoff rankings on Sunday, landing them a spot in the Capital One Orange Bowl, along with No. 11 Florida State. The loss to Ohio State knocked Michigan out of contention for a Big Ten championship and was a serious detriment to the Wolverines chances of securing a playoff spot this season. Michigan players said Sunday afternoon they were disappointed to come up short of the playoff but were looking forward to playing the Seminoles.Its disappointing, it is, Michigan captain Jake Butt said. But youve got to remind yourself that we put ourselves in that position and we had plenty of opportunities to change outcomes. The season was in our hands, and we didnt get things done when they needed to get done. Its disappointing, but you cant dwell on the past. Theres still a big game to play at the end of December. Were not going to let that opportunity slip by worrying about what could have been.Harbaugh said he didnt think he would have any problems encouraging his team for the coming month.I know Im motivated and ready to put in the work, he said. Im looking forward to it. Asics Outlet Store . The 17-year-old native of Marystown, N.L., pulled out of Skate Canada International last month in Saint John, N.B., with the same problem. Cheap Vapormax Australia . Nine days before the opening ceremony, organizing committee chief Dmitry Chernyshenko said Wednesday that Sochi is "fully ready" and will deliver safe, friendly and well-run games that defy the grim reports that have overshadowed preparations. http://www.discountaustraliashoes.com/cheap-air-max-90-fake.html . He says so-called TRT is only one problem and he wants to go even further than the ban. "Its about time," St-Pierre told reporters at a promotional event in Montreal on Friday. "I think its a good thing. Yeezy 350 V2 Australia . The Redskins announced Monday that the quarterback who led the team to the Super Bowl championship in the 1987 season will serve as a personnel executive. Wholesale Shoes Australia .C. United of Major League Soccer. United chose the defender in the second round of the 2013 MLS re-entry draft. The BCCI is set to file a review petition against the Supreme Courts verdict that approved most of the Lodha Committees recommendations. The decision to file the petition is based on the advice of former Supreme Court judge Markandey Katju, who was appointed to counsel the board on the verdict related to the implementation of the committees recommendations. It is also learnt BCCI president Anurag Thakur and secretary Ajay Shirke will not go through with their scheduled meeting with the Lodha Committee on Tuesday after Katju advised them against it.Our judicial review petition is pending. We will be going to file it [in the next two days]. Till the outcome is not there how can we go and attend the meeting? a top BCCI official told ESPNcricinfo. Justice Katju has clearly told us that you should go for the review petition. Members have also agreed [with his assessment]. We will look at the outcome of the review petition and take the necessary action. It is understood that with the parliamentary session in progress on Tuesday, Thakur, who is a Member of Parliament with the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party, will be unavailable to meet the Lodha Committee in any case. It is understood that Shirke wrote to the committee on Sunday night requesting that the meeting be deferred. The committee, however, declined the request.According to a legal expert, a review petition has to be filed within 30 days of the verdict, and it will be heard by the same bench of judges that passed the judgement, in this case Chief Justice of India TS Thakur.Review petitions are usually entertained when there is an error apparent. But here is a case where two judges have taken a very serious view of the matter; its not like they have passed a judgement after one hearing, the legal expert told ESPNcricinfo. The judges have taken a very specific view on the matter. The question of whether its wrong is not something the Supreme Court is going to go into. They are not going to re-examine those things.The expert said 99% of the petitions were dismissed in the chamber itself.dddddddddddd [Review petitions come into the picture in] cases where very serious legal errors are committed, which the court may not have been aware of, the expert said.Some fact, for example, which for some reason the court didnt consider which completely alters the nature of the judgement. Its just sort of a thing which parties file mostly to prolong the matter as opposed to actually getting any relief.The point of having a Supreme Court is to ensure matters come to a conclusion and some final judgement is arrived at. Now if they will file a review petition it will go before CJI Thakur and some other judge who will be assigned to the matter.The expert felt that should Thakur and Shirke not meet with the Lodha Committee it might lead to contempt proceedings. There is an argument that can be made that the committees findings essentially merge with the Supreme Courts judgement, he said. Therefore, if they fail to abide by an order of the court then that could amount to contempt of the court.I am pretty sure if they dont meet them tomorrow then someone will file a contempt petition or the Supreme Court itself can also suo moto, take it upon themselves and say you should have appeared, or the Lodha Committee might write to the Supreme Court and say they havent appeared.A Lodha Committee source also confirmed that contempt proceedings would be initiated should Thakur and Shirke not turn up for the meeting.The BCCI official, however, suggested the board couldnt afford to worry about consequences considering that they were fighting for survival. This is all we can do, what else can we do, he said. We also have our fundamental rights.Katju, who submitted an interim report to the BCCI on Sunday, had also termed the courts order unconstitutional and illegal and said it had violated principles of the Indian Constitution. ' ' '
